"Right now, it's good. But it was in '72, '86, 2000, and 2007." - Jamie Dimon, May 2026.

The Shiller CAPE ratio just hit 42.3. The only time in 140 years it's been higher? December 1999.

Stocks can stay expensive for a long time...

It’s one metric to consider, but when your portfolio is built around the most expensive equities in modern history, what else you diversify with could really matter.

Blue-chip contemporary and post war art has shown near-zero correlation with the S&P since 1995.* Prices are largely driven by private collectors competing for a fixed supply of artwork by artists like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso.

Masterworks lets you invest in shares of that market.

My subscribers skip the waitlist here.

^{*According to Masterworks data. Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. See important Reg A disclosures at masterworks.com/cd.}

President Donald Trump did not hide his reaction after the Supreme Court rejected his push to narrow birthright citizenship. He mocked the Court publicly and sarcastically congratulated Chinese leader Xi Jinping and China, calling the ruling a “massive” win for them. Trump’s point was blunt.

If foreign nationals can enter the United States illegally, or come here temporarily, have a child, and secure automatic U.S. citizenship for that child, America is giving away one of its most valuable legal statuses by geography alone. The ruling blocks Trump’s executive effort to reinterpret who is “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States under the 14th Amendment.

The media wants to frame this as Trump attacking judges. That misses the real fight. Birthright citizenship is not an academic issue. It shapes border traffic, hospital costs, school strain, housing demand, and future political power through population counts.

Trump is forcing the question into the open: who gets to define American citizenship, elected leaders or judges? The Court kept the status quo intact. That means the incentive remains in place. Cross the border, give birth here, and the child receives a U.S. passport. Watch Congress next, because Trump’s team now needs statute language, enforcement pressure, and a new case built to survive this Court.

Fox News reported the Court struck down Trump’s executive order in a 6-3 decision, with three conservative justices joining the liberal bloc. The ruling says the executive branch cannot limit automatic citizenship for children born on U.S. soil. Immigration hawks called it destructive and outrageous.

The media angle is “Trump lost.” The real angle is sharper: conservatives no longer trust every Republican-appointed justice to hold the line on immigration.

The Washington Examiner reported a 5-4 split and said Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices against Trump’s order. Notre Dame College Republicans called Barrett an “absolute disgrace,” tying their criticism to her Notre Dame roots. The vote count reporting differs across outlets, but the political damage is the same. Barrett is now the face of conservative anger over a ruling that locks in automatic citizenship for children of illegal aliens.

After Trump v. Barbara, DOJ officials said they will prosecute birth tourism schemes instead of challenging citizenship status after birth. That means visa fraud, false statements, brokers, and networks selling U.S. births as a package deal. This is the lane the Court left open.

If DOJ hits the organizers hard, it can damage the industry. If prosecutors settle for a few press releases, birth tourism keeps operating with better lawyers.

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in NRSC v. FEC that federal caps on party-candidate coordinated spending violate the First Amendment. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. This is a win for political speech and basic accountability. A party backing its nominee is not corruption.

It is politics. Voters can see party committees, track reports, and punish them at the ballot box. Shadow groups are harder to pin down.

The Epoch Times breakdown makes the practical effect plain: children of illegal immigrants and temporary visitors remain covered by birthright citizenship. The Court leaned on its reading of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. Trump’s team tried to narrow “subject to the jurisdiction,” and the Court refused. That leaves three paths: Congress, a future Court fight, or a constitutional amendment.

None are easy. All are now on the table.

Most Americans do not understand how the system actually works. They know politicians lie, courts block orders, agencies drag their feet, and Congress hides behind procedure. The Government 101 Field Guide is the plain-English field manual for how power moves in Washington, and how you can spot the game before it hits your wallet.

Remember when the birth tourism issue was dismissed as a fringe talking point? Now DOJ is openly saying it will prosecute birth tourism schemes after the Supreme Court locked in automatic citizenship for U.S.-born children. That is not a theory. That is a federal enforcement target.

They buried it because the facts wreck the narrative. There are organized networks that sell American birth as a product, coach clients on visas, and turn hospitals into citizenship processing centers. The Court just made clear the child’s citizenship is safe. That puts the entire burden on DOJ to punish the fraud before the birth happens.

What it means now is simple. Enforcement moves from the baby to the broker. If Pam Bondi’s DOJ wants results, it needs indictments, asset seizures, and real prison time for the people selling access to U.S. citizenship.

I will keep watching the Court, DOJ, and the money trail. What did I miss? Hit reply.

Stay free,

Brett Lee Editor, Project Liberty projectlibertyus.com

Follow: @projectlibertyus | @real brett lee